Brussels Brief - May 26, 2006

May 26, 2006

Full Printable Version in PDF Format

(Adobe Acrobat Reader required, available for free download  here)

KEY DEVELOPMENTS

Competition:   ECJ Decision on Fines in the Amino Acids Cartel Case

Philip Torbøl

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has delivered its judgment in Archer Daniels Midland’s appeal of the Court of First Instance decision concerning the amino acids cartel.  The judgment is noteworthy in two respects.  First, the ECJ establishes that the European Commission is entitled independently to make changes to the level of, and the methodology for, calculating fines, and to apply these changes to cases concerning conduct that took place before the changes were made.  Second, the ECJ rejects that sanctions imposed on members of a cartel in a non-EU country, which relate only to the effects of the cartel on the market of that country, should be taken into account in the Commission’s calculation of fines.

 

Intellectual Property:  EU Design Registration System to be linked with WIPO International System

Patrice Corbiau

The European Parliament has approved the Commission’s proposals to link the 'Community Design' system, which protects designs within the EU, with the international design registration system of the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO).  These proposals would allow designers, with one single application, to obtain protection of a design not only throughout the EU, but also in the countries which are members of the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement concerning the international registration of industrial designs.  The creation of a link between the Community Design system and the WIPO system would encourage EU companies active in sectors such as textiles, furniture, cars, jewellery and mobile phones to trade with third countries in the knowledge that their designs are protected.  So far, 19 countries have become party to the Geneva Act, including Singapore, Korea, Turkey and Switzerland.

 

Mergers:  Commission Clears Takeover of Gemplus by Axalto, Subject to Conditions

Geert Dierickx

The European Commission has approved under the EU Merger Regulation the planned acquisition by the Dutch company Axalto of Gemplus, established in Luxembourg.  Both companies are active worldwide in the production and sale of SIM cards, payment cards and government and identification cards.  Further, they provide services related to the administration of already-issued SIM cards and carried out through over-the-air platforms, which enable mobile phone operators to control a SIM card without a physical connection.  The Commission found that the merged entity would have both the ability and the incentive to harm its competitors, as the transaction would combine two important intellectual property portfolios.  In order to address the Commission’s concerns, Axalto agreed to grant a ten-year licence of the combined entity’s patent portfolio and to disclose interoperability information to ensure the compatibility of its competitors’ SIM cards with its platforms.

 

Information Society:  Modernisation of the Television Without Frontiers Directive

Elena Kostadinova

The European Commission has proposed a Directive amending the Television Without Frontiers Directive.  The proposal, which followed a European Parliament resolution to take account of the technological developments and changes in the structure of the audiovisual market, is currently under discussion in the Parliament and Council.  The scope of the Directive will be extended to on-demand audiovisual services, for example films or news.  This will allow audiovisual media service providers to offer on-demand services in the EU by only complying with the laws of their own Member State.  The proposed Directive will relax the rules on insertion of advertising in TV programmes and will leave the way open to new forms of advertising such as virtual or interactive advertising.  It will also provide a clear legal framework for product placement.  The proposed Directive is thus expected to enhance the competitiveness of the EU audiovisual industry.

 

Internal Market:  EU Action Plan to Halt Loss of Biodiversity by 2010

Andrea Hamilton

The European Commission has adopted a communication outlining an EU action plan designed to halt the loss of biodiversity by 2010.  Biodiversity, which comprises ecosystems, species and genes, is essential to economic prosperity, security and health.  The new communication outlines several concrete measures to be undertaken by EU Institutions and Member States with regard to biodiversity preservation at an EU and global level.  Overall, the action plan is intended to help meet prior commitments made by EU Member States.  In particular, EU Heads of State or Government committed in 2001 to halt biodiversity loss in the EU by 2010.  In 2002, Member States joined with more than 130 countries, agreeing to reduce global biodiversity loss.  While the new communication outlines an ambitious programme, it has nevertheless been criticised by certain environmental groups who find the measures insufficient to actually halt EU biodiversity loss by 2010.

 

Energy:  ECJ Rules Against Luxembourg for Failure to Transpose Gas Directive

Maria Scimemi

The European Court of Justice has ruled against Luxembourg for failing to transpose into national law the 2003 Directive on the Liberalisation of Gas Markets, which should have been implemented by July 2004.  In its report on the internal market for electricity and gas, adopted in November 2005, the Commission identified the delay in applying the 2003 gas and electricity directives as one of the main causes for the shortcomings in the European internal energy market.  On that occasion the Commission urged the Member States that had not yet transposed the directives to do so as quickly as possible.  In March this year, the Commission started infringement procedures against 17 Member States for failing to open their energy markets consistently with the Directive.  A new report will be issued by the Commission at the end of 2006 following its review of the effectiveness of measures adopted by Member States. 

 

Competition:  Commission Investigates 20 Energy Companies over Abusive Charges

Yannis Virvilis

The European Commission has investigated as many as 20 major European energy companies for allegedly abusing their dominant position in the energy market.  Companies such as Gaz de France, E.ON and OMV are among the companies that were the object of the Commission’s dawn raids.  The alleged abusive conduct of the companies involved concerns access to pipelines and storage facilities.  The Commission has repeatedly emphasised that the European energy market is not sufficiently competitive and that end-users do not benefit from low prices.

 

NEXT WEEK’S EVENTS

Monday 29 May – Friday 2 June 2006

 

COUNCIL MEETINGS

Competitiveness Council (29 – 30 May 2006)

Justice and Home Affairs Council (1 – 2 June 2006)

Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council (1 – 2 June 2006)

 

COURT OF JUSTICE

Judgments

Approximation of laws

C-475/04 Commission v Greece

 

Freedom of establishment

C-453/04 Innoventif

 

Intellectual property

C-169/05 Uradex

 

Law governing the institutions

C-459/03 Commission v Ireland

 

State aid

C-207/05 Commission v Italy

Joined Cases C-442/03 P, C-471/03 P P&O European Ferries (Vizcaya) v Commission

 

Taxation

C-98/05 De Danske Bilimportører

 

Transport

C-317/04 Parliament v Council

C-318/04 Parliament v Commission

 

Opinions

Agriculture

Joined Cases C-129/05, C-130/05 Raverco

C-120/05 Heinrich Schulze

 

Energy policy

C-413/04 Parliament v Council

C-414/04 Parliament v Council

 

Environment and consumers

C-486/04 Commission v Italy

 

Freedom of movement for persons

C-150/04 Commission v Denmark

C-371/04 Commission v Italy

 

Taxation

C-347/04 Rewe Zentralfinanz

 

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

Judgments

Agriculture

T-87/94 Blom v Council and Commission

 

Competition

T-198/03 Bank Austria Creditanstalt v Commission

 

Intellectual property

T-15/05 De Waele v OHMI

 

State aid

T-354/99 Kuwait Petroleum (Nederland) v Commission

 

McDermott Will & Emery

McDermott Will and Emery