Some virtual currency units and positions are treated as commodities by the CFTC and US courts. The IRS has told taxpayers that it views convertible virtual currency as property, not foreign currency, for federal tax purposes. Lacking clear guidance from either the IRS or the Department of the Treasury, this article addresses issues that may help determine whether Internal Revenue Code provisions that apply to commodities might also apply to transactions involving virtual currencies and positions.
Some virtual currency units and positions are treated as commodities for US commodity regulatory purposes by both the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the courts. This raises the question of whether the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) might follow the CFTC’s lead and treat certain virtual currency units or positions as commodities for tax purposes and, if so, on what basis? The answer to this question is important because treating a virtual currency as a commodity for tax purposes could significantly affect its tax treatment.
At of the date of this article, IRS Notice 2014-21 (2014-16 I.R.B. 938) and the 2019 Frequently Questions (FAQs) tell us that the IRS views convertible virtual currency as property, not foreign currency, for federal tax purposes (Notice 2014-21, Q&As 1 and 2; 2019 FAQs). We have no Department of the Treasury or IRS guidance as to whether virtual currency might be taxed as a commodity. This article addresses whether virtual currency and positions might be taxed as commodities. (For a discussion of whether virtual currency positions can be treated as securities for tax purposes, see McDermott’s Memorandum, “Can a Virtual Currency Position be Treated as a Security for Tax Purposes?”
Definitions of Commodities
When considering whether property is a commodity for tax purposes, the IRS has deferred in the past to the CFTC as to what constitutes a “commodity” (New York State Bar Association Tax Section, « Report on the Taxation of Cryptocurrency, » January 26, 2020). The CFTC gets its regulatory authority from the Commodities Exchange Act (CEA), and the CEA defines a commodity quite broadly to include certain enumerated agricultural commodities, “all other goods and articles,” and “all other services, rights, and interests. . . in which contracts for future delivery are presently or in the future dealt in” (CEA § 1a(4)). Based on this broad definition, the CFTC has already asserted jurisdiction over certain—but not all—virtual currency transactions (CFTC Press Release, “CFTC Staff Issues Customer Advisory on Digital Tokens,” July 16, 2018; CFTC, “Customer Advisory: Use Caution When Buying Digital Coins or Tokens”).
We can also look at the Internal Revenue Code provisions that refer to or define commodities. For example, there is a trading safe harbor provided for certain foreign investors in the US commodity markets (1973-1 C.B. 337). For the trading safe harbor, commodities are defined as being “of a kind customarily dealt in on an organized commodity exchange” where transactions of its kind are “customarily consummated at such place” (I.R.C. § 864(b)(2)(B)(iii)). In Rev. Rul. 73-158 (1973-1 C.B. 337), the IRS applied the trading safe harbor to off-exchange sales of raw sugar, ruling that the term commodities is used in its ordinary financial sense. The IRS said that commodities include all products that are traded and listed on US commodity exchanges, including actual commodities and commodity futures contracts.
The term commodity is defined even more broadly than it is for the trading safe harbor in the Code provision that allows commodity dealers and traders to elect into mark-to-market. The trader election into mark-to-market defines commodity to include any commodity that is actively traded for purposes of the tax straddle rules, including, physical commodities, derivative instruments in any commodity and evidences of interests in any commodity (I.R.C. § 475(c)(2)(A). Treas. Reg. § 1.1092(d)-l(c)(1) provides that the actively traded standard requires an established financial market, ranging from an interdealer market to an established financial market). Evidences of interests include any option, forward, contract, futures contract, short position or any similar instrument in a commodity (I.R.C. § 475(e)(2)). The term commodity also includes a position that is not itself a commodity if the position serves as a hedge of a commodity.
It appears likely that some virtual currency units and positions will be treated as commodities for tax purposes. (Compare Treas. Reg. § 1.6045-1(a)(5) (limiting the definition of commodity to property in which futures have been “approved” for trading by the CFTC). There is a question as to whether futures that are traded pursuant to the CFTC’s self-certification process meet this definition. There is also a question as to whether futures contracts need to trade on a product at all for the product to be treated as a commodity for CFTC purposes.) The way in which a commodity is defined for CFTC regulatory purposes is likely to serve as the guide for the tax definition for some Code provisions. As a result, those virtual currencies that are treated as commodities by the CFTC are likely to be treated as commodities for tax purposes.
* * * *
Taxpayers should discuss their virtual currency positions with their tax advisors to determine whether any of the Code provisions that apply to commodities might be applied to their transactions. Taxpayers should be aware of the possibility that some virtual currency units and positions are likely to be treated as commodities for tax purposes.
For a discussion of some of the Code provisions that apply to commodities, see the following McDermott articles: