Wilber (Bill) Boies focuses his practice on business dispute counseling and business litigation throughout the country.
Chambers USA (2006) says “Clients readily turn to Boies for ‘bet the ranch’ type cases and hail him as a ‘top-notch, well-seasoned litigator in the ERISA arena.’ He has built his reputation acting for financial institutions in weighty cases centered on securities and fraud issues.” The Legal 500 (2007) says “Clients seek out the ‘formidable’ Wilber Boies, who doubles up as a financial and securities litigator, for his extensive experience in stock-drop litigation.” Chambers USA (2008) says “Bill Boies ‘is a good strategic thinker – smart, tactical and pragmatic.'” Chambers USA (2009) says “Boies wins acclaim for his highly tuned and carefully considered approach to litigation…’the perfect courtroom strategist.'” Chambers USA (2010) says “Bill Boies is a highly prized litigator.” Chambers USA (2011) says “He has an excellent way with clients and is extremely polished in the courtroom.” Chambers USA (2014) says clients “admire Bill Boies’s substance, noting he is a ‘driving force’ in the practice.” Chambers USA (2015) says “Bill Boies is well regarded for his decades of experience in..class action litigation.” Chambers USA (2017) says “Clients describe Bill Boies as ‘very responsive…on top of everything we need…giving us good advice on the range of options.'”
Benefits Litigation
Bill regularly represents benefit plan sponsors and fiduciaries in Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) class action litigation concerning pension plan administration, fiduciary duty, responsibility for asset losses, and changes in welfare benefits. Several of his health benefits class action victories resulted in court-approved savings to employers valued at more than $100 million. He has defeated several high-exposure class actions regarding company stock price declines in benefit plans, with claimed losses exceeding $1.5 billion. Bill has successfully defended several class actions claiming huge investment losses in 401(k) plans. He successfully defended the bank trustee of the country’s third-largest employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) company in a class action challenging the creation of the ESOP and voting at director elections. Bill’s experience includes Department of Labor investigations and defense against professional malpractice claims related to benefit plan advice.
Securities Litigation
Bill represented an investment fund plaintiff in Equity Funding Securities Litigation in Los Angeles; the defendant corporation in Food Fair Securities Litigation and related shareholder derivative actions in Philadelphia; and the outside directors in Carnation Securities Litigation in Los Angeles and in the related insurance coverage dispute and Securities and Exchange Commission investigation, which led to the SEC’s “Carnation rule” on corporate disclosure obligations. Bill has defended securities class actions attacking public company forward-looking statements and market timing in mutual funds.
Financial Institution Disputes
Bill has acted as special counsel for banks and thrifts, and represented financial institution owners in disputes with regulatory agencies about capitalization and safety and soundness problems, including bank seizures and subsequent litigation. He won a $155 million damages judgment against the United States in the savings and loan “goodwill” litigation in the US Court of Federal Claims and on appeal. Bill has represented plaintiffs and defendants in fraudulent conveyance and fraud lawsuits following failed leveraged buyouts, and defended banks and thrifts in substantial lender liability lawsuits. He represents banks and trust companies as defendants in class actions contesting trust fees, share voting and other administrative procedures.
Class Actions
Bill has extensive experience in the defense of class and multi-party lawsuits throughout the United States involving securities fraud, business failures, franchise systems, insurance and benefits plans, consumer fraud and antitrust claims. His recent consumer class action victories involve credit card transactions and a nationwide series of class actions about telephone services billing. He writes the chapter on “Complex and Multi-District Litigation” for the Illinois Institute of Continuing Legal Education Class Actions Manual.
Trials and Appeals
Bill has tried and won jury and bench trials in state and federal courts across the country. He defended Chicago’s largest grocery retailer in the trial of a consumer price-fixing class action dismissed at the close of the plaintiffs’ evidence. He writes the chapter on “Trial of Federal Cases” for the Illinois Institute of Continuing Legal Education Federal Civil Practice manual.
Bill has argued and won numerous appeals in the US Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Eleventh and Federal Circuits, the Illinois Appellate Court and the Illinois Supreme Court. One notable appellate victory was the complete reversal of a $125 million district court ruling against a pension plan sponsor. Bill defeated the State of Illinois in constitutional litigation challenging a statue that directed a private foundation to “contribute” $125 million of its endowment to the state.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Bill has experience with a variety of ADR devices, including mediations, arbitrations and court enforcement of arbitration awards. He was appointed by the Court of Federal Claims as the plaintiffs’ ADR negotiator in efforts to settle some 125 cases filed by savings and loan plaintiffs against the United States challenging legislation that wiped out $10 billion in regulatory capital. He trained in the CPR Institute Mediation Training Program and has been a member of the CPR Panels of Distinguished Neutrals. Bill is a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Dispute Resolution Arbitrator.
Other Activities
Bill has served several terms on McDermott’s Management, Executive, and Compensation Committees, and a three-year term as head of the Firm’s Litigation Department of more than 400 lawyers across the United States.
Education
University of Chicago Law School, JD
Brown University, BA
Admissions
Illinois
Counsel | Chicago
Chicago: +1 312 984 7686
Chicago: +1 312 984 7700
Chicago Bar Foundation Report / January 2019
Chicago, Illinois / Speaking Engagements / November 15, 2018
San Diego, California / Speaking Engagements / May 11, 2018
On the Subject / February 16, 2016
Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education Class Actions Handbook 2015 Edition / October 2015
Complex and Multi-District Actions
Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education's Federal Civil Practice 2015 edition / 2015
Trial of Federal Cases
The Recorder / October 23, 2014
Criticism of Cy Pres Settlements Goes Too Far
On the Subject / July 7, 2014
On the Subject / May 6, 2014
Law360 / April 4, 2014
6 Tips for Addressing Cy Pres Awards in Class Actions
Law360 / February 25, 2014
Sponsors Should Update ERISA Plans after High Court Ruling
Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law / February, 2014
On the Subject / December 17, 2013
On the Subject / December 6, 2013
1
2
3
Law360 / September 6, 2018
Press Releases / August 15, 2016
Journal of Securities Litigation & Regulation / November 24, 2015
Bloomberg BNA Pension & Benefits Daily / November 12, 2015
Law360 / November 10, 2015
National Law Journal / June 15, 2015
Law360 / March 18, 2015
Business Insurance / February 15, 2015
Supreme Court Retirement Benefits Ruling Provided Clarity for Employers
The Recorder / October 23, 2014
Boston / Accolades & Rankings / August 19, 2014
Accolades & Rankings / May 27, 2014
McDermott Continues to Earn Top Rankings in Chambers USA 2014
Law360 / April 17, 2014
Bloomberg BNA / April 15, 2014
On Remand From Sixth Circuit, State Street Beats Stock-Drop Claim; Presumption Applies
Law360 / April 11, 2014
1
2
3
Do not send any information or documents that you want to have treated as secret or confidential. Providing information to McDermott via email links on this website or other introductory email communications will not create an attorney-client relationship; will not preclude McDermott from representing any other person or firm in any matter; and will not obligate McDermott to keep confidential the information you provide. McDermott cannot enter into an attorney-client relationship with you until McDermott has determined that doing so will not create a conflict of interest and until you and McDermott have entered into a written agreement or engagement letter that sets forth the terms of our relationship.
We use cookies to improve the functionality and performance of this site. By continuing to use this site, you are providing us with your consent to our use of cookies. Please see our Privacy Policy for details.