Overview
Linda Doyle, defending an Oregon medical center against its former CEO’s claims that actions he took while employed were intended to expose potential fraud, said that the actions “have no relevance to [the CEO’s] claims for retaliation related to the CMS Self-Disclosure issue, blacklisting, or tortious interference.” Ms. Doyle added that her client “should neither have to defend nor engage in protracted discovery concerning irrelevant and sprawling issues.” Read the full article.
