Michael B. Kimberly is co-chair of the Firm’s Supreme Court and Appellate Practice Group. He handles complex appeals and trial court motions with a primary focus on antitrust law, administrative law and constitutional law. An accomplished appellate lawyer, Michael has argued appeals in courts throughout the country, including five times in the US Supreme Court, three times before the en banc courts of appeals, and a dozen other times in the federal courts of appeals and state appellate courts. He has briefed more than 200 appellate matters, including 25 Supreme Court merits cases.
Michael is a visiting lecturer in law at Yale Law School, where he co-directs the Yale Law School Supreme Court clinic.
Michael is widely recognized as an effective Supreme Court and appellate litigator. He was identified by The Legal 500 (2017-2019) as a “next generation” Supreme Court practitioner and by Law360 (2016) as a top appellate advocate under 40, with “a yearslong track record of effective advocacy before the nation’s highest court.” Michael has been described in the National Law Journal (2017) as a “veteran U.S. Supreme Court and appellate lawyer” and in the Washington Post (2015) as a “seasoned Supreme Court practitioner.” According to Reuters (2014), he is among “the top handful of lawyers in America” who “dominate” the docket of the US Supreme Court.
Michael’s notable US Supreme Court cases include unanimous victories in Smith v. Berryhill, concerning the scope of judicial review of final agency action under Section 405(g); and Shapiro v. McManus, concerning the availability of review before three-judge district courts. Michael represented the petitioner in France v. United States, a white-collar criminal case in which his briefing persuaded the solicitor general to confess error.
While in law school, Michael served as editor of The Yale Law Journal and executive editor of the Yale Law and Policy Review. Following law school, Michael clerked for Judge Michael Daly Hawkins on the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
*Matter handled prior to joining McDermott.
Education
Yale Law School, JD, 2008
University of Pennsylvania, MA, 2005
Princeton University, BA, summa cum laude, 2003
Admissions
Maryland
District of Columbia
Courts / Agencies
US Supreme Court
US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
US District Court for the District of Columbia
US District Court for the District of Maryland
Partner | Washington, DC
Washington, DC: +1 202 756 8901
Washington, DC: +1 202 591 2768
Webinar / McDermott Event / July 8, 2019
On the Subject / June 28, 2019
On the Subject / June 28, 2019
Law360 / June 6, 2019
1
The National Law Journal / August 13, 2019
DOJ's Noel Francisco Wants to Argue in Disputed Gun Case the Justices ...
Law360 / August 13, 2019
Bloomberg Law: Tax / August 13, 2019
Supreme Court Practices Are ‘Fool’s Gold’ Without Appellate Focus
Law360 / August 7, 2019
Tax Notes / July 9, 2019
Law360 / June 27, 2019
Wall Street Journal / June 27, 2019
Supreme Court Declines to Set Limits on Political Gerrymandering
The Washington Post / June 27, 2019
The National Law Journal / June 27, 2019
Kagan Writes Stinging Dissent as Court Sidesteps Politically Rigged Election Maps
Law360 / June 7, 2019
Bloomberg Law / June 12, 2019
Trump Solicitor General Has High Court’s Ear as Ideologies Meet
Commercial Dispute Resolution / June 12, 2019
Law360 / June 10, 2019
The Deal / June 6, 2019
Law360 / June 4, 2019
Bloomberg: Big Law Business / June 3, 2019
Washington, DC / Press Releases / June 3, 2019
The National Law Journal / June 3, 2019
1
2
3
Do not send any information or documents that you want to have treated as secret or confidential. Providing information to McDermott via email links on this website or other introductory email communications will not create an attorney-client relationship; will not preclude McDermott from representing any other person or firm in any matter; and will not obligate McDermott to keep confidential the information you provide. McDermott cannot enter into an attorney-client relationship with you until McDermott has determined that doing so will not create a conflict of interest and until you and McDermott have entered into a written agreement or engagement letter that sets forth the terms of our relationship.
We use cookies to improve the functionality and performance of this site. By continuing to use this site, you are providing us with your consent to our use of cookies. Please see our Privacy Policy for details.
