Sarah Bro is the office managing partner for the Firm’s Orange County office. She focuses her practice on trademark prosecution, enforcement and brand portfolio management, as well as licensing, due diligence, copyright, right of publicity and domain name matters.
Sarah assists clients across an array of industries with all stages of domestic and international trademark prosecution, and provides consultation and strategy with respect to the selection, clearance, enforcement and licensing of trademarks. Sarah’s client’s include domestic and international companies in industries such as health care, blockchain and financial technologies, software/mobile applications, three-dimensional printing, agriculture, fashion and apparel, consumer goods, beauty, wellness and lifestyle (including CBD products), arts and entertainment, food and beverage, hospitality, mining and pharmaceuticals. Sarah has extensive experience in the research, drafting and filing of documents with the US Patent and Trademark Office, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and the US Copyright Office. Sarah has a proven track record in recovering domain names through the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) policies. Sarah is also well versed in the submission of “takedown” and infringement notices across third-party websites, social media platforms, app stores and online marketplaces. She has experience in swiftly addressing instances of fraud, phishing or other online abuse by leveraging intellectual property claims through a multi-pronged enforcement approach. Sarah also regularly provides intellectual property (IP) support and guidance in due diligence matters in connection with corporate transactions such as mergers, acquisitions and corporate reorganizations. Sarah’s experience includes a three-month secondment in Germany in the in-house legal department of a leading generic pharmaceuticals company, where she handled a full array of trademark prosecution matters, global brand portfolio management and strategic clearance for a key worldwide product launch.
Sarah is a member of McDermott’s Pro Bono Committee, the Gender Diversity Committee, the Income Partner Committee, the Integrity and Compliance Committee, and the Orange County Recruiting Committee. Sarah is a regular contributor to McDermott’s IP Update newsletter.
She is also a member of our legal cannabis industry group. Our Cannabis Industry group is a multidisciplinary team of lawyers providing clients with regulatory, litigation, intellectual property, trade and tax services with respect to their investments and participation in the cannabis industry, all subject to the Firm’s obligations under federal and state laws and bar licensure rules.
May 18-22, 2019
IP Update, Vol. 22, No. 3 - March 2019
IP Update, Vol. 22, No. 2 - February 2019
IP Update, Vol. 22, No. 1 - January 2019
IP Update, Vol. 21, No. 12 - December 2018
November 6-9, 2018
IP Update, Vol. 21, No. 11 - November 2018
November 6-9, 2018
IP Update, Vol. 21, No. 10 - October 2018
October 10, 2018
IP Update, Vol. 21, No. 9 - September 2018
IP Update, Vol. 21, No. 8 - August 2018
July 13, 2018
IP Update, Vol. 21, No. 6 - June 2018
IP Update, Vol. 21, No. 5 - May 2018
IP Update, Vol. 21, No. 4 - April 2018
IP Update, Vol. 21, No. 3 - March 2018
IP Update, Vol. 21, No.2 - February 2018
February 23, 2018
IP Update, Vol. 21, No. 1 - January 2018
IP Update, Vol. 20, No. 12 - December 2017
IP Update, Vol. 20, No. 11 - November 2017
IP Update, Vol. 20, No. 10 - October 2017
IP Update, Vol. 20, No. 9 - September 2017
September 5, 2017
IP Update, Vol. 20, No. 8 - August 2017
IP Update, Vol. 20, No. 7 - July 2017
IP Update, Vol. 20, No. 6 - June 2017
IP Update, Vol. 20, No. 5 - May 2017
IP Update, Vol. 20, No. 4 - April 2017
IP Update, Vol. 20, No. 2 - February 2017
IP Update, Vol. 19, No. 11 - November 2016
IP Update, Vol. 19, No. 10 - October 2016
IP Update, Vol. 19, No. 9 - September 2016
IP Update, Vol. 19, No. 8 - August 2016
IP Update, Vol. 19, No. 7 - July 2016
IP Update, Vol. 19, No. 6 - June 2016
May 19, 2016
International News: Focus on Real Estate - Spring 2016
IP Update, Vol. 19, No. 3 - March 2016
IP Update, Vol. 19, No. 2 - February 2016
IP Update, Vol. 19, No. 1 - January 2016
IP Update, Vol. 18, No. 11 - November 2015
IP Update, Vol. 18, No. 10 - October 2015
September 20, 2015
Do Online Retailers’ Search Results Constitute Trademark Infringement?
IP Update, Vol. 18, No. 9 - September 2015
IP Update, Vol. 18, No. 8 - August 2015
IP Update, Vol. 18, No. 7 - July 2015
IP Update, Vol. 18, No. 6 - June 2015
IP Update, Vol. 18, No. 5 - May 2015
April 15, 2015
Chuck Yeager's Latest Suit Pulls Out of Nose Dive: Yeager et al. ...
IP Update, Vol. 18, No. 4 - April 2015
IP Update, Vol. 18, No. 3 - March 2015
IP Update, Vol. 18, No. 2 - February 2015
January 26, 2015
January 23, 2015
First Amendment Protects Use of Third-Party's Trademark in Video Game
IP Update, Vol. 18, No. 1 - January 2015
December 10, 2014
IP Update, Vol. 17, No. 12 - December 2014
December 1, 2014
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Sustains Opposition on the Basis of Fraud
IP Update, Vol. 17, No. 11 - November 2014
October 14, 2014
Ninth Circuit Finds Permanent Injunction Questionable Despite Trademark Infringement
IP Update, Vol. 17, No. 10 - October 2014
IP Update, Vol. 17, No. 9 - September 2014
IP Update, Vol. 17, No. 8 - August 2014
IP Update, Vol. 17, No. 7 - July 2014
May 16, 2014
Ninth Circuit Confirms That Trademark Cancellation is Remedy and Not Cause of ...
IP Update, Vol. 17, No. 5 - May 2014
IP Update, Vol. 17, No. 4 - April 2014
IP Update, Vol. 17, No. 1 - January 2014
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
... 14
November 15, 2016
1
Do not send any information or documents that you want to have treated as secret or confidential. Providing information to McDermott via email links on this website or other introductory email communications will not create an attorney-client relationship; will not preclude McDermott from representing any other person or firm in any matter; and will not obligate McDermott to keep confidential the information you provide. McDermott cannot enter into an attorney-client relationship with you until McDermott has determined that doing so will not create a conflict of interest and until you and McDermott have entered into a written agreement or engagement letter that sets forth the terms of our relationship.
We use cookies to improve the functionality and performance of this site. By continuing to use this site, you are providing us with your consent to our use of cookies. Please see our Privacy Policy for details.
